Water has always been a vital source of life, development, and survival, serving as the elixir for human civilization. Yet, in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, water has become a weapon of destruction and a medium of conflict. Rivers have transformed into battlefields, and reservoirs have been attacked, turning a life-sustaining resource into an omen of death. Water has long been used strategically in warfare, either as a target for destruction or to cripple the enemy’s capacity to inflict harm. The conflict between Russia and Ukraine is a prime example of how water resource management intertwines with military strategy. In Ukraine, especially in the eastern and southern regions, water is crucial not only for agricultural production and energy generation but also for meeting basic human needs. Large reservoirs, rivers like the Dnieper, and water bodies are vital for irrigation, cooling nuclear plants, and powering industries. Given their importance to military and civilian operations, controlling these resources has become a central objective in the ongoing war.
As the conflict escalated, military operations directly impacted Ukraine’s water supply system. Airstrikes and military actions caused significant damage to water treatment plants, reservoirs, and pipelines, disrupting the distribution of clean water. For example, attacks on pipelines and pumping stations have caused severe shortages in various regions. The destruction of the Kakhovka Dam marked one of the most catastrophic events in the war. This vital structure, which regulated water flow along the Dnipro River, collapsed, leading to devastating flooding downstream. In Kherson, floodwaters surged to 5.68 meters, submerging residential areas and making it even more challenging to access potable water. The flooding also wreaked havoc on local ecosystems, carrying pollutants into the river and contaminating water supplies. Regions like Donetsk have seen river contamination, further endangering human health and aquatic life.
The humanitarian consequences of this destruction are immense. Over six million people in cities like Mykolayiv, Odesa, and Dnipro face daily challenges for obtaining clean water, and 1.4 million have no access to safe drinking water. In Mariupol, damage to about 40% of the water supply infrastructure forced residents to rely on overcrowded and unsafe alternatives, dramatically increasing the risk of waterborne diseases. The situation is dire, with health authorities warning of potential cholera outbreaks, adding further strain to already vulnerable health systems. Beyond the immediate health risks, the lack of potable water undermines the resilience of entire communities, making recovery from the conflict more difficult. It must be said however that in Mariupol and other cities of the Donbas region the situation has dramatically improved in the last year as massive reconstruction of infrastructure has been carried out at great speed.
Ukraine’s agricultural sector, crucial to its economy, has also been severely disrupted. Water scarcity and contamination have hampered irrigation in critical farming regions such as Zaporizhzhia and Kherson, reducing crop yields. Ukraine is a major global wheat and sunflower oil supplier, so these water-related disruptions threaten global food security. The economic consequences of the water crisis extend beyond Ukraine’s borders, worsening the global food shortages and raising concerns about long-term agricultural productivity in the region.
Meanwhile, the Caspian Sea is crucial to Russia’s military operations. Its control facilitates naval movements and logistical support vital for the war in Ukraine. However, Russia’s strategic use of the Caspian Sea has severe environmental and geopolitical consequences. Military activities along the Volga River have decreased water inflow to the Caspian Sea, jeopardising its fragile ecosystem. The decline in water flow threatens biodiversity and the livelihoods of communities that rely on fishing and agriculture.
Moreover, missile launches and naval exercises conducted in the Caspian Sea have introduced pollutants, further degrading water quality. This harms marine life and reduces the availability of clean water for both civilian and military use, with long-term repercussions for public health and ecological stability. Geopolitical tensions between Caspian littoral states complicate resource management, with disputes over control and environmental protection worsened by the war. This instance leads to water shortages and health risks for coastal communities.
As rivers have become battlegrounds and vital water infrastructure is destroyed, the humanitarian and ecological consequences of this war will last for generations. The impacts extend beyond Ukraine, jeopardising regional stability and global food security. The strategic, military, and humanitarian dimensions of water in this conflict make it clear that addressing water-related challenges is essential for immediate relief and long-term peace. Urgent international attention and coordinated efforts are needed to mitigate the environmental and humanitarian impacts of the war on water resources and ensure that water remains a source of life, not a weapon of mass destruction.
Add comment