The article argues that Russia and China’s support for Iran reflects a broader anti-imperialist geopolitical alignment that often overlooks the internal human rights violations of allied regimes.
The author critiques Farooq Abdullah for presenting a selective historical narrative, arguing that key structural causes—particularly those leading to the abrogation of Article 370—are omitted.
India and South Korea are transitioning from a primarily economic relationship to a long-term strategic partnership shaped by future geopolitical and technological challenges.
The author argues that the Strait of Hormuz crisis represents a shift from regional conflict to a global maritime chokepoint confrontation shaped by international law.
The author argues that what exists today is something far more consequential: a controlled maritime corridor, where access is no longer guaranteed by international law, but negotiated through power, perception and political alignment.
The author argues that the Taiwan Strait is another choke point in global trade and is crucial for India. Any disruptions can lead to massive delays and cost escalations for consumers and businesses in India.
Today, Hormuz is no longer a Persian Gulf problem that has repercussions in the Indo-Pacific, but rather it is an Indo-Pacific structural and operational vulnerability that happens to be located in the Middle East.
